Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234754

  • DG
  • DG's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2827
  • Thank you received: 333

Subi is missing Schofield, Hayden, Braut, Kentfield, Giro...so does that mean if we do win your mob will be bottom 3?
Yes BC, 3 ex afl, 1 very unlucky not to get drafted as yet and big Braut. Joondy may have some premierships players missing but they are not of the same calibre as the above mentioned players imo 
"I'll be the fkng sheriff"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by DG.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234756

  • westaussieguy
  • westaussieguy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4043
  • Thank you received: 357
Subiaco have firmed as favourites to win this match. Apparently paying one dollar 65c for the win, whilst West Perth sitting on 2$ and 20c.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234759

  • Johnny Leonard
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 566
  • Thank you received: 82
Disappointing in some ways but very nice in others. Great to win. Great to steal a win. Back line under siege most of the game. Savigni is a star. Eaton gave everything . Impressed by Golding, again. Kitch was a tiger . Mayo a big presence. 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Johnny Leonard.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234761

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 8998
  • Thank you received: 1553
Second week in a row where the term "winning ugly" is very appropriate. Our skills at times were pretty ordinary and we were kept in it to a certain extent by WPs inaccuracy. What we can't criticise is our intent, work ethic and just an innate ability to stay in the contest.

I thought Jack Mayo was superb and my BOG, Kitch worked hard all day, the Motts tidied up their disposal efficiency, Clark not dominant but still had an impact, Savigni excellent down back Golding and  Foley did some good things. I also like Alone in the team as he gives that extra bit of toughness at the contest.

WP may have been missing a few but it's still very hard to win when you're up against 25...enough said.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by BC.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234762

  • Whinnen
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 214
  • Thank you received: 14
Well well well, i was patiently anticipating one of you blokes would dare bring up the umpires. It is quite clear now that you blokes cry foul week in, week out. If you reckon you had the short straw you are dead set dreaming. There were 2 x #15's for $ubi today, our inaccuracy played a massive part but that maggot was your 23rd man, he repelled many defensive thwarts for you blokes and had a hand in 2 or 3 goals, what was it, 5 x 50M penalties ???. I watched the Peel game last week and you were given a nice ride. On a positive note it was a good game, we gave you a 4 goal head start and had your measure for most part of the game, but its hard to win when your up against 25...enough said.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234764

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 8998
  • Thank you received: 1553
It must be nice living in a red and blue parallel universe to the rest of us. Why were you patiently anticipating one of us raising the umps if there was no issue with them? Did you notice the bias towards the jerkers too? WP is the most favoured side for frees in the comp and have been for several years.

We didn't get a free kick in the first quarter, the count was 12 to 2 during the second, 16 to 6 midway through the third and finished 25 to 15. What part of a lopsided free kick count don't you get? I'm not saying your frees weren't there, just the interpretation wasn't applied equally to both sides.

BTW...give me the chinless wonder's email address and I'll send him a voucher for a carton of piss for kicking 2.6 and handing us the game but the value will only be for 4 cents in the $ for obvious reasons.

Sorry, I'll also send one to that big log who hit the post from 10 meters.  Kick that and you win the game by a point but that's footy I guess..  

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by BC.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234766

  • Whinnen
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 214
  • Thank you received: 14

It must be nice living in a red and blue parallel universe to the rest of us. Why were you patiently anticipating one of us raising the umps if there was no issue with them? Did you notice the bias towards the jerkers too? WP is the most favoured side for frees in the comp and have been for several years.

We didn't get a free kick in the first quarter, the count was 12 to 2 during the second, 16 to 6 midway through the third and finished 25 to 15. What part of a lopsided free kick count don't you get? I'm not saying your frees weren't there, just the interpretation wasn't applied equally to both sides.

BTW...give me the chinless wonder's email address and I'll send him a voucher for a carton of piss for kicking 2.6 but the value will only be for 4 cents in the $ for obvious reasons.
BC, I now know your full of shit. We could have got 50 more kicks but none were as impactful as the 2 or 3 goals you blokes got. You can crap on about the 4c in the dollar as much as you like, we weren't the club that almost brought down the entire integrity of the competition with the brown paper bags saga. I stagger to believe that you cant say you had a good day by the maggots, staggering !!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234769

  • screemar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 229
  • Thank you received: 9
piss off BC, your full of shit, five young kids played for wp today, five under 16s kids played in the seconds also. clarke, what a lump of fat he is and what about lifting of the ground and charging a player, no more qbe and no more bar takings, every year 300 grand loss, umpire number 15, wouldn't have a clue, oh sorry, cant pay the players under the table any more so we will pay off the umps.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234771

  • BC
  • BC's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 8998
  • Thank you received: 1553
At least we're paying someone...how are you debt dodgers going? Sore losers...we won, you lost...get over it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Subi v Munchers 1 month 5 days ago #234773

  • screemar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 229
  • Thank you received: 9
i remember when you blokes were rattling cans and i put my few dollars in the tin to save your club.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: BC

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 346 guests and 3 members online

  • Royals78
  • Success Hill
  • one time only

Newest Footy Recruits

  • MyzhCow
  • MyzhRearo
  • EddieAstef
  • Robertseari
  • Lost WAFL